Who the heck is Foxit, you may ask? Well, to those in the PDF world, they’re known as an Adobe competitor, having developed a lightweight PDF reader in 2007 which had a great reception and is still used by many. So they definitely have some “cred” when it comes to the ebooks arena.
Their first portable ebook reader is known as the Foxit eSlick and could be considered an entry level device due to its very affordable pricetag ($289), yet it still manages to offer users a great set of features.
Design
- e-Ink screen - Nothing unusual, pretty much every ebook reader uses this technology
- Thin profile – A svelte 0.4 inches…nice!
- Lightweight – 6.4 ounces (think 2 average sized cell phones)
- Long battery life – A single charge lasts up to 8000 page turns (wow!)
- Quick recharge – The battery can be recharged in only 3-4 hours
- Internal memory – Only 128 mb, fairly weak compared to competitors (some offer > 2 GB)
- External memory – An SD slot is available, so this gives you the option of adding up to 8 GB of dat
- Colors – Available in white, grey, or black
Audio
- Built in MP3 Player – You can transfer music to the eSlick via a USB port and listen while you read.
- Create – The eSlick of course uses Foxit’s great PDF generation technology (their PDF Creator software is included) so you can convert and download many file formats
- Zoom – You can easily zoom between 50-400%
- Reflow – The font size can be controlled and text is automatically resized for optimal viewing
Price
- Price – Hold the phone!! $289? No way! This is the cheapest ebook reader we’ve seen so far!
Summary
Rating:
Popularity: 18% [?]


‘Page turns’ may not be good indicators of battery life. For the purpose of establishing record-breaking, ‘page turns’, it is easy to electronically turn the pages at high speed until the battery looses power. Some time will be spent on each page in actual reading, so perhaps a better gauge of battery life would be a controlled page turning based on average reading speeds with the screen on maximum brightness and some duration of internet access included as expected during normal use..may be a better and more accurate benchmark for battery duration.